Copy Studio
Emails and letters, checked against your rules
Check the document against your adopted medical and legal rules. Releases enter the same record as Carousel work.
As you write
The flag lands on the word, not in a report on Thursday
A finding lands on the offending word, with the rule it broke and where that rule came from. A full pink squiggle means a machine settled it. The same squiggle, softer, means a rule reaches these words and only a person can decide.
Rewriting
A suggested wording is checked before you are told it works
Every candidate is checked against the same document and the full rule set before it appears.
What you wrote
Our balanced fund has beaten its benchmark every year since 2019.
Three wordings, each checked again
Stops a release
Our balanced fund has beaten its benchmark every year since 2019, and we expect that to continue.
This wording breaks a rule the original did not: no forward-looking promise about returns.
Needs a person
Our balanced fund outperformed its benchmark in every year since 2019.
Still a performance claim. A person has to decide whether it stands, and nothing here has.
Clear
Our balanced fund outperformed its benchmark in each year from 2019 to 2024. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Checked again against every rule in force, not only the one it was asked to fix. Clear.
A suggested rewrite is not trusted because it was suggested. Each one goes back through every rule you have, so a fix that quietly breaks something else never reaches you as a fix.
Versions
Nothing is ever overwritten
Revisions are numbered and kept. An approval is tied to the words that were approved, so editing one sentence makes a new revision rather than quietly leaving a signature standing over copy nobody read.
Every version, oldest first
- rev 1First draft of the prescriber letter.Pasted in
- rev 2Efficacy paragraph rewritten with the label figure.Edited
- rev 3Source line added under the figure.A wording you accepted
- rev 4One sentence changed in the dosing paragraph.Edited
Not approved. Revision 3 is untouched and still says exactly what Dr Okafor read.
Nothing is ever overwritten, and revisions cannot be deleted. An approval is tied to the words that were approved, so changing one sentence cannot quietly leave a signature standing over copy nobody read.
Getting it in
Start from anywhere, and be told what arrived
Paste text, import Word, open one Google Doc or start from one of 79 templates. Imports list what was read, kept and omitted.
Paste it
Straight out of wherever you were writing.
Read a file in
.docx, .md or .txt. A .doc is refused by name.
Read a link in
A Google Doc shared to anyone with the link, or a file by URL.
Start from a template
79 of them, across thirteen categories.
What came out of the Word file
- 9 paragraphs
- read as copy and checked
- 2 headings
- kept, and marked as headings
- 1 comment from legal
- carried across with the words it was about
- 3 tracked deletions
- not checked — you already removed them
- 1 line reading “TK: confirm”
- kept and flagged rather than quietly dropped
Nothing is dropped in silence. A clean result over words that were never read is the one failure this is built to prevent.
Variants
One piece, forked into the versions it really has
A variant is a sibling document with its own revisions and approval. Lettered tabs move between versions for different markets, audiences or uses.
This document has three siblings
Each is its own document with its own revisions and its own approval, and they stay a set — so you move between them from the plate rather than hunting through a folder.
Signing
A signature that says what it means
Four meanings, and the signer picks one. “I read this” and “this may go out” are different claims, and a record that cannot tell them apart is worth nothing at an inspection.
Approved for release
“This may go out.”
Reviewed
“I have read this and have no objection. Not a release decision.”
Authored
“I wrote these words. The weakest claim, and the right one for a draft.”
Responsible
“I hold responsibility for this content, however it was reviewed.”